Under the World Tree

Lüroth's Theorem and Simple Connectedness of P1

Posted: March 1, 2026 | Updated: September 11, 2026

Over the last few days I've been learning some machinery used to analyse Gm\mathbb{G}_{m}-actions in algebraic geometry. One of the results I've needed for this is Lüroth's theorem. In this write-up I will follow the proof given in Hartshorne, which makes the geometric content of the statement clear and establishes theory about morphisms of curves along the way. This is a favourite theme in my recent work - analysis of field extensions usually provides strong information about morphisms of varieties. I especially enjoy results in the characteristic pp case; the field theory developed on its own can feel overly complicated.

The main result from curve theory we use is Hurwitz's theorem. In this note we will assume all curves are nonsingular projective, and make note if results extend more generally.

Definition: Let f:XYf : X \to Y be a morphism of curves. We say ff is separable if the induced extension K(X)/K(Y)K(X)/K(Y) of function fields is separable.

Hurwitz's Theorem: Let f:XYf: X \to Y be a finite separable morphism of curves, with degree n=[K(X):K(Y)]n = [K(X): K(Y)]. Then

2g(X)2=n(2g(Y)2)+deg(R),2g(X)-2 = n(2g(Y)-2) + \text{deg}(R),

where R=pXlength(ΩX/Y, p)pR = \sum_{p \in X} \text{length}(\Omega_{X/Y, \ p}) p is the ramification divisor and g(X)g(X) is the (geometric) genus.

If f:XYf: X \to Y is a finite morphism of curves, then K(X)/K(Y)K(X)/K(Y) is a finite extension and there is a subfield LL of K(X)K(X) such that K(X)/LK(X)/L is purely inseparable and L/K(Y)L/K(Y) is separable. By the equivalence of categories between fields of transcendence degree one and function fields of curves, to LL corresponds a curve ZZ for which we have a factorisation

Composition of curve maps
.

We can use Hurwitz to study the separable part, so we are left to analyse the purely inseparable part XgZX \xrightarrow{g} Z (recall that inseparability is a characteristic pp phenomenon, so we can assume XX is defined over Zp\mathbb{Z}_{p} for some prime pp).

Definition: Let XX be a scheme with local rings of characteristic pp. The Frobenius morphism F:XXF: X \to X is defined to be the identity map on the topological space of XX, with corresponding sheaf morphism F#:OXOXF^{\#} : \mathcal{O}_{X} \to \mathcal{O}_{X} the ppth power map.

The local rings assumption ensures FF is a morphism. For a ring AA, the map AA,aapA \to A, a \mapsto a^p is an additive homomorphism if and only if all middle terms of (a+b)p(a+b)^p vanish for every choice of aa and bb, which holds for every characteristic pp ring.

If XX is a kk-scheme and kk has characteristic pp, the Frobenius morphism is not kk-linear, instead satisfying πF=Fπ\pi F = F \pi, where π\pi is the structure morphism XπSpec(k)X \xrightarrow{\pi} \text{Spec}(k). This can be thought of as kk-linearity for maps between two different kk-schemes: let XpX_p have the same scheme structure as XX, but with structure morphism π=Fπ:XpSpec(k)\pi' = F \pi : X_{p} \to \text{Spec}(k). Then our equation reads π=πF\pi' = \pi F, so that the Frobenius is a kk-linear morphism F:XpXF' : X_{p} \to X. To distinguish the two perspectives we call FF' the kk-linear Frobenius morphism.

Proposition: Let f:XYf: X \to Y be a finite morphism of curves such that K(X)/K(Y)K(X)/K(Y) is a purely inseparable extension. Assume XX and YY are defined over an algebraically closed field kk of characteristic pp. Then XX and YY are isomorphic as abstract schemes (excluding the structure morphisms) and ff is a composition of kk-linear Frobenius morphisms. In particular, g(X)=g(Y)g(X) = g(Y).

Proof: The kk-linear Frobenius map YpYY_{p} \to Y corresponds on function fields to the injection K(Y)^pK(Y)K(Y) \xhookrightarrow{\hat{} \, p} K(Y), which is a degree pp extension K(Y)/K(Y)pK(Y)/K(Y)^p. The extension is equivalent to the extension K(Y)1/p/K(Y)K(Y)^{1/p}/K(Y) where the top field is obtained by adding all ppth roots in an algebraic closure of K(Y)K(Y) to K(Y)K(Y), in the sense that there is an isomorphism K(Y)K(Y)1/pK(Y) \cong K(Y)^{1/p} which sends K(Y)pK(Y)^p to K(Y)K(Y).

Now if K(X)/K(Y)K(X)/K(Y) is finite and purely inseparable in characteristic pp, its degree is prp^r for some pp. Since K(X)prK(Y)K(X)^{p^r} \subseteq K(Y) we have K(X)K(Y)1/prK(X) \subseteq K(Y)^{1/p^r}, and since K(X)/K(Y)K(X)/K(Y) and K(Y)1/pr/K(Y)K(Y)^{1/p^r}/K(Y) both have degree prp^r we see that K(X)=K(Y)1/prK(X) = K(Y)^{1/p^r}. The sequence of curve morphisms YprFYpr1FFYpFYY_{p^r} \xrightarrow{F'} Y_{p^{r-1}} \xrightarrow{F'} \dots \xrightarrow{F'} Y_{p} \xrightarrow{F'} Y with Ypr=(Ypr1)pY_{p^r} = (Y_{p^{r-1}})_{p} for r1r \geq 1 realises K(Y)1/prK(Y)^{1/p^r} as the function field of a finite purely inseparable morphism Ypr(F)rYY_{p^r} \xrightarrow{(F')^r} Y, so since nonsingular projective curves are determined up to isomorphism by their function fields we see that XYprX \cong Y_{p^r}. \square

The moral of this result is that the interesting finite morphisms of curves are exactly the separable ones (the inseparable part has a standard form). This means that Hurwitz's theorem is essentially a universal tool for studying these morphisms.

Lemma: Let f:XYf : X \to Y be a finite morphism of curves, g(Y)1g(Y) \geq 1. Then g(X)g(Y)g(X) \geq g(Y).

Proof: As discussed above, we can factor into a separable and a purely inseparable part, and genus is unchanged for the purely inseparable part of the extension. Assume without loss of generality that ff is separable. Then we can rearrange the formula from Hurwitz's formula:

2g(X)2=n(2g(Y)2)+deg(R)    g(X)=n(g(Y)1)+12deg(R)+1= g(Y)+(n1)(g(Y)1)+12deg(R).\begin{aligned} 2&g(X) - 2 = n(2g(Y) -2) + \text{deg}(R) \\ \implies &g(X) = n(g(Y)-1) + \frac{1}{2}\text{deg}(R) + 1 \\ = \ &g(Y) + (n-1)(g(Y)-1) + \frac{1}{2}\text{deg}(R). \end{aligned}

In the right-hand side, the ramification divisor has non-negative degree and n,g(Y)1n, g(Y) \geq 1, so we see that g(X)g(Y)g(X) \geq g(Y). \square

Using the formula in the lemma, we have g(X)=g(Y)g(X) = g(Y) if and only if deg(R)=0\text{deg}(R) = 0 and either n=1n =1 or g(Y)=1g(Y) = 1. In other words, there are no finite morphisms between non-isomorphic curves of genus 2.\geq 2. We have yet to cover the genus 0 case, which we handle separately since we can say more.

Definition: A curve YY is simply connected if for every finite étale morphism f:XYf: X \to Y, XX is isomorphic to the disjoint union of deg(f)\text{deg}(f) copies of YY. We say YY has no nontrivial étale covers.

Remark: The Frobenius morphism (and thus any inseparable extension) is not an étale cover. In fact, FF' is everywhere ramified: since FF' induces the ppth power map on local rings, if QYQ \in Y is any point and tt a local parameter at QQ we have F#t=tpF^{'\small\#}t = t^p with valuation pp in OY,Q\mathcal{O}_{Y, Q}.

Lemma[HS IV-1.3.5]: Let XX be a (nonsingular projective) curve. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. (a) XX is rational
  2. (b) g(X)=0g(X) = 0
  3. (c) XX is isomorphic to P1\mathbb{P}^1.

Lemma: Pk1\mathbb{P}^1_{k} is simply connected.

Proof: Let f:XPk1f : X \to \mathbb{P}^1_{k} be a finite étale morphism, and assume XX is connected. Then XX is smooth over kk (composition of smooth morphisms is smooth) and proper because ff is finite, which makes XX a curve. A finite étale morphism of curves is separable, so by Hurwitz's theorem 2g(X)2=2n.2g(X) - 2= -2n. Since n1n \geq 1 and g(X)0g(X) \geq 0, this identity holds if and only if n=2n =2, g(X)=0g(X) = 0. By the lemma above, we conclude that XP1X \cong \mathbb{P}^1. \square

Lüroth's Theorem: Let kk be an algebraically closed field. If k(t)/kk(t)/k is a purely transcendental extension of degree 1, any subfield LL is also purely transcendental over kk.

Proof: Assume that LkL \neq k, so that LL has transcendence degree 1. Then LL is the function field of a curve, and the extension k(t)/Lk(t)/L is finite (or else k(t)k(t) would have transcendence degree 2\geq 2) corresponding to a finite morphism f:Pk1Yf: \mathbb{P}^1_{k} \to Y (K(Y)=LK(Y) = L). By the genus inequality YY cannot have genus g(Y)1g(Y) \geq 1, so g(Y)=0g(Y) = 0 and YP1Y \cong \mathbb{P}^1. It follows that Yk(u)Y \cong k(u) for some uu. \square

Profile picture

Written by Corey Lionis, denizen of the world-tree hollow.