Posted: March 1, 2026 | Updated: September 11, 2026
Over the last few days I've been learning some machinery used to analyse -actions in algebraic geometry. One of the results I've needed for this is Lüroth's theorem. In this write-up I will follow the proof given in Hartshorne, which makes the geometric content of the statement clear and establishes theory about morphisms of curves along the way. This is a favourite theme in my recent work - analysis of field extensions usually provides strong information about morphisms of varieties. I especially enjoy results in the characteristic case; the field theory developed on its own can feel overly complicated.
The main result from curve theory we use is Hurwitz's theorem. In this note we will assume all curves are nonsingular projective, and make note if results extend more generally.
Definition: Let be a morphism of curves. We say is separable if the induced extension of function fields is separable.
Hurwitz's Theorem: Let be a finite separable morphism of curves, with degree . Then
where is the ramification divisor and is the (geometric) genus.
If is a finite morphism of curves, then is a finite extension and there is a subfield of such that is purely inseparable and is separable. By the equivalence of categories between fields of transcendence degree one and function fields of curves, to corresponds a curve for which we have a factorisation

We can use Hurwitz to study the separable part, so we are left to analyse the purely inseparable part (recall that inseparability is a characteristic phenomenon, so we can assume is defined over for some prime ).
Definition: Let be a scheme with local rings of characteristic . The Frobenius morphism is defined to be the identity map on the topological space of , with corresponding sheaf morphism the th power map.
The local rings assumption ensures is a morphism. For a ring , the map is an additive homomorphism if and only if all middle terms of vanish for every choice of and , which holds for every characteristic ring.
If is a -scheme and has characteristic , the Frobenius morphism is not -linear, instead satisfying , where is the structure morphism . This can be thought of as -linearity for maps between two different -schemes: let have the same scheme structure as , but with structure morphism . Then our equation reads , so that the Frobenius is a -linear morphism . To distinguish the two perspectives we call the -linear Frobenius morphism.
Proposition: Let be a finite morphism of curves such that is a purely inseparable extension. Assume and are defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic . Then and are isomorphic as abstract schemes (excluding the structure morphisms) and is a composition of -linear Frobenius morphisms. In particular, .
Proof: The -linear Frobenius map corresponds on function fields to the injection , which is a degree extension . The extension is equivalent to the extension where the top field is obtained by adding all th roots in an algebraic closure of to , in the sense that there is an isomorphism which sends to .
Now if is finite and purely inseparable in characteristic , its degree is for some . Since we have , and since and both have degree we see that . The sequence of curve morphisms with for realises as the function field of a finite purely inseparable morphism , so since nonsingular projective curves are determined up to isomorphism by their function fields we see that .
The moral of this result is that the interesting finite morphisms of curves are exactly the separable ones (the inseparable part has a standard form). This means that Hurwitz's theorem is essentially a universal tool for studying these morphisms.
Lemma: Let be a finite morphism of curves, . Then .
Proof: As discussed above, we can factor into a separable and a purely inseparable part, and genus is unchanged for the purely inseparable part of the extension. Assume without loss of generality that is separable. Then we can rearrange the formula from Hurwitz's formula:
In the right-hand side, the ramification divisor has non-negative degree and , so we see that .
Using the formula in the lemma, we have if and only if and either or . In other words, there are no finite morphisms between non-isomorphic curves of genus We have yet to cover the genus 0 case, which we handle separately since we can say more.
Definition: A curve is simply connected if for every finite étale morphism , is isomorphic to the disjoint union of copies of . We say has no nontrivial étale covers.
Remark: The Frobenius morphism (and thus any inseparable extension) is not an étale cover. In fact, is everywhere ramified: since induces the th power map on local rings, if is any point and a local parameter at we have with valuation in .
Lemma[HS IV-1.3.5]: Let be a (nonsingular projective) curve. Then the following are equivalent:
- (a) is rational
- (b)
- (c) is isomorphic to .
Lemma: is simply connected.
Proof: Let be a finite étale morphism, and assume is connected. Then is smooth over (composition of smooth morphisms is smooth) and proper because is finite, which makes a curve. A finite étale morphism of curves is separable, so by Hurwitz's theorem Since and , this identity holds if and only if , . By the lemma above, we conclude that .
Lüroth's Theorem: Let be an algebraically closed field. If is a purely transcendental extension of degree 1, any subfield is also purely transcendental over .
Proof: Assume that , so that has transcendence degree 1. Then is the function field of a curve, and the extension is finite (or else would have transcendence degree ) corresponding to a finite morphism (). By the genus inequality cannot have genus , so and . It follows that for some .
